Sunday 20 April 2014

Japanese parliamentary committee wants Southern Ocean whaling to continue "as the only country in the world with a scientific approach"


Photograph of Japanese whale hunt found at Sky News

Will Japan’s internal politics go further than just encouraging its government to continue its Antarctic lethal research/commercial whaling venture?

Aljazeera 16 April 2014:

A Japanese parliamentary committee has unanimously passed a resolution urging the government to investigate all options to continue whaling, including "walking out of the (international whaling) convention".

The 40-strong fisheries committee, made up of a cross-section of members of the lower house, demanded on Wednesday the government redesign its "research" whaling programme to circumvent an international court ruling that described the programme as a commercial hunt dressed up as science.

It said the ruling earlier this month by the International Court of Justice that banned Japan's research whaling programme in the Southern Ocean was "truly regrettable" but "does not necessarily prevent Japan's whaling, which is a unique tradition and culture".
The panel demanded the government find a way to continue the research operation "so as to play a responsible role as the only country in the world with a scientific approach", according to AFP news agency. 

The parliamentarians also demanded the government swiftly draw up a plan to replace the banned Antarctic whaling operation and fully prepare for a new programme while circulating "whale meat - a by-product of research whaling - appropriately as before".
Although it is a signatory to the International Whaling Convention (IWC), which bans the commercial hunting of the mammals, Japan has used a loophole that allows for "lethal research". 

It said it was perfectly proper for people to consume the meat that was the inevitable by-product of the killing….

I Touch Myself: breast cancer awareness campaign in 2014




YouTube 13 April 2014:

You can help keep Chrissy's dream alive by spreading her message. Visit http://itouchmyself.org

'I Touch Myself' was the Divinyls' biggest hit and touched millions of fans around the globe. Released in December 1990, the single was No. 1 on the charts at home and reached the Top 5 in the US.

It is a song that celebrates female sexuality like no other. Like Chrissy, it is bold, brave, and brassy. It rocked our world. And when Chrissy developed breast cancer, it was a song she wanted to become an anthem for spreading awareness about the importance of touching ourselves for early detection of the disease.

As a tribute, Chrissy's family and friends, her husband Charley Drayton, fellow songwriters, Cancer Council NSW and supporters from around the globe have come together to make sure Chrissy's legacy lives on to remind women to be in touch with their bodies, and if something's not right, see their doctor.

Ten of Australia's greatest singers: Connie Mitchell; Deborah Conway; Kate Cerebrano; Katie Noonan; Little Pattie; Megan Washington; Olivia Newton-John; Sarah Blasko; Sarah McLeod; and Suze DeMarchi have come together to make Chrissy's final wish a reality.
 

Saturday 19 April 2014

A bottle of wine may be the least of the NSW Coalition Government's problems


It’s not just that then NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell denied in evidence before the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) that he had received a bottle of Penfold’s Grange wine worth almost $3,000 from Nick Di Girolamo on 20 April 2011, nor his failure to declare this gift on his member’s disclosure declaration, that caused him to resign.

The situation is more complex than that and, much of it centers around his friendship with Liberal Party fundraiser and lobbyist Nick Di Girolamo possibly intruding into his decision making in an official capacity.

In 2009 Australia Water Holdings Pty Ltd (AWH) donated $14,350 to the Liberal Party of Australia (NSW Division), in 2010 donations totalled $26,100.00 to the NSW Division and in 2010-11 it donated $61,603 in thirteen different parcels, according to disclosures lodged with the NSW Electoral Funding Authority.

Along the way the company also managed to spend $1,350 fundraising for an unspecified political campaign team.

In 2010-11 AWH also donated $2,200 to the Australian Labor Party (NSW Branch) and $10,000 to the National Party of Australia (NSW).



According to media reports, then Shadow Minister for Natural Resource Management and now NSW Minister for Primary Industries Katrina Hodgkinson passed that $10,000 donation straight onto the Nationals state branch.  

On 6 June 2007 Nick and Jodie Di Girolamo made a personal donation to the “Liberal Party” of $2,500 and on 30 September 2010 Nick Di Girolamo made a personal donation to the “NSW Liberal Party” of $1,833.

In 2011 Australian Water Holdings contracted Liberal Party power broker Michael Photios, who was then acting as a government relations consultant, to supply advice to then CEO Nick Di Girolamo and lobby the O’Farrell Government on the company’s behalf for a fee of $5,000 per month.

On 18 January 2012 state-owned Sydney Water Corporation and Australian Water Holdings Pty Ltd signed a project management service contract and Liberal Party member/fundraiser and AWH part-owner Nick Di Girolamo was appointed to the board of State Water in July 2012 at which time Ms Hodgkinson was water minister with responsibility for the corporation. 

In 2013 Mike Baird as Treasurer told an estimates hearing that all board appointments were made on merit and approved by cabinet.

On 17 March 2014 it was reported that the Liberal Party of Australia intended to return to Sydney Water the $75,636 in AWH political donations which had been improperly billed to the state-owned water corporation as AWH administration fees.

Mr. Di Girolamo appears to have resigned from Sydney Water on the day the two NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) investigations Credo and Spicer were announced. He is also reported to have resigned from the board of Australian Water Holdings in 2013 and possibly divested himself of shareholdings in that company since then.

Di Girolamo gave evidence during the first investigation and, both the fact that AWH was blatantly gouging the state-owned water agency Sydney Water for millions of dollars and his high level of access to the NSW Coalition Government and then Premier Barry O’Farrell came to light.
When questioned in the NSW Parliament on 26 March 2014, Premier O’Farrell did not deny a 26 May 2011 meeting between himself, the former finance minister and Mr. Di Girolamo about AWH at which it was allegedly decided that Sydney Water should stop the public tender process and replace its managing director in the new tender process.
Neither did he deny writing a letter of support on 28 September 2010 in his capacity as Opposition Leader, in order to assist Australian Water Holdings in securing that lucrative contract with Sydney Water nor deny an earlier 12 August meeting with Di Girolamo and Obeid concerning his support of AWH’s bid for the Sydney Water contact and a September 2011 meeting with Di Girolamo.

On 16 April 2014 Barry O'Farrell resigned as NSW Premier after he was found to have mislead the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption.
That this level of contact between O'Farrell and Australian Water Holdings may not have been  in the best interests of the people of New South Wales is indicated by the fact that barely one day into his new premiership Mike Baird stepped back from his previous 12 November 2013 support of board appointments; I am happy to stand in this Chamber and state clearly that we are very proud of the appointments we have made to our State-owned corporations. And I stand by every statement I have made and, his 2012 particular support as Treasurer of Nick Di Girolamo. Conceding that his backing as the then shareholding minister for State Water Corporation and cabinet’s backing of a Sydney Water board appointment for Di Girolamo were wrong moves; In hindsight, should that have been done? No.

However, according to Fairfax Media Premier Baird and former Premier O'Farrell also have a wider history with regard to political donations and board appointments:

In July [2012], Mr Massy-Greene was appointed chairman of Networks NSW, which will manage the state-owned electricity networks, Ausgrid, Endeavour Energy and Essential Energy, when they are merged into a single entity.
No executive search was undertaken before the appointment, which was confirmed by Mr Baird in a press release on July 2.
At a budget estimates hearing at State Parliament today, opposition MPs revealed that Mr Massy-Greene's company, Eureka Capital Partners, has donated $15,000 to Mr Baird's election campaigns.
According to NSW Election Funding Authority records, Eureka Capital Partners donated $10,000 to Mr Baird in March 2007 and $5000 in March last year, shortly before the state election.
As chairman of Networks NSW, Mr Massy-Greene reports directly to Mr Baird and the Finance and Services Minister, Greg Pearce.
The Treasurer told the hearing he had known Mr Massy-Greene "through the years as someone ... through business".
Challenged by Labor MPs about whether the appointment was appropriate, given the donations, Mr Baird insisted it was made by the Premier, Barry O'Farrell.
"It's a Premier's decision, he made the decision," Mr Baird said. "We are appointing people on the basis of their merits."
ICAC is yet to hear evidence in the second investigation concerning allegations that between April 2009 and April 2012, former Liberal NSW Minister for Resources and Energy Christopher Hartcher and Liberal MPs Darren Webber and Christopher Spence, along with others including Timothy Koelma and Raymond Carter, corruptly solicited, received, and concealed payments from various sources in return for certain members of parliament favouring the interests of those responsible for the payments.

It is possible that a number of Liberal Party MPs and perhaps Liberal Senator Arthur Sinodinos may be called as witnesses during this investigation.

Mr. O’Farrell led a government that is likely to be judged as corrupt on a number of fronts by New South Wales voters whatever the final ICAC report concludes – in the meantime that bottle of wine has allowed him to escape the full glare of future media scrutiny while the political secrets still work their way into the light during Operation Spicer hearings.

NOTE: This post will be updated in the text whenever new information becomes known.

When South East Queensland Floods.......


The Dogs Swam Out The Window

The rain came down for weeks on end
We thought it would never stop
The river was over, the road was gone
Under a lake of flood
When the water came in and we had to move
To somewhere on higher ground
A friend offered a hand and the whole town accepted
With kit and belongings in tow
Before we left in the dinghy stacked high
We secured the dogs in the shed on the hill
And hoped they be safe there and dry
The whole district huddled
In one little house on the highest hill
And we sat there all looking out
As the rain just kept coming for days and days still
And the water crept slowly up this our last hill
As you can imagine an Ark was discussed
Children just played in the onrushing gush
Oblivious to worries that had their elders flushed
And as the water lapped the verandah
And we thought swimming, our last dance
The clouds suddenly parted
The storms broke just by chance
And the dogs swam out the window

Reprinted with the kind permission of Vincent J Wight

Friday 18 April 2014

Baby Boomers not old fuddy duddies



A letter to the editor in The Sydney Morning Herald on 15 April 2014 shines a light on media misconceptions regarding older Australians:

I’m a bit bemused that there is some surprise that the Nielsen poll shows that those "who would have been expected to be the most enthusiastic" about the reactionary reintroduction of knights and dames – over-55s – have rejected this concept. 
We were the ones who created the Vietnam war moratorium; spoke loudly against the ballot for conscription; struggled for women’s rights through the feminist movement (though that has gone a bit awry through the idea that all mothers must immediately return to the workforce when their child is a babe – it was about choice); and wanted indigenous recognition. 
Why on earth is there this stereotype of "old fuddy duddies" when I happen to think the baby boomers where much more progressive than the subsequent generations?

Wendy Akers Pearce
ACT

Tony Abbott still has some loyal followers it seems


Here is someone who still proudly supports Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott.....




She appears to have the typical world view of many dedicated Abbott supporters......


Thursday 17 April 2014

One blogger's reaction to what the mainstream media are not saying about the O'Farrell resignation


Blogger Victoria Rollison in The Australian  Independent Media Network, 16 April 2014:

Today the media have presented their preferred frame for the resignation of Barry O’Farrell as: he mistakenly lied to an ICAC enquiry because he forgot that he received a $3,000 bottle of wine from the CEO of Australian Water Holdings. But of course O’Farrell didn’t resign because of his problems with ‘memory’. He resigned because he could no longer deny a personal expensive-wine-recipient, hand-written-note-receiver, phone-call-taker-relationship with someone who was earning over a million dollars a year as CEO of a company in a public-private partnership with the government Barry O’Farrell was in charge of up until today. This information is completely absent from the media’s framing of this story. But just imagine for a moment if one part of this story was different. Imagine for a moment that Barry O’Farrell was a Labor Premier. Imagine if Tony Abbott, standing by O’Farrell and brawling with a journalist asking questions about corruption, was a Labor Prime Minister. The ‘chaos, scandal, dysfunction, smear’ machine works in overdrive for Labor stories, but can’t even get out of second gear when Liberals are involved.