Sunday 3 August 2008

Liberty and Democracy: a rose by any other name is still a marginal political party

Last Friday the Australian Electoral Commission advertised the Liberty and Democracy Party's application for a name change to the Liberal Democratic Party, with the abbreviation Liberal Democrats (DLP). Objections to the change close on 1 September 2008.

This appears to be the party's second attempt to effect this name change.

Somehow the proposed new name doesn't quite match the party's eccentric website blurb.

The Government is comprised of politicians and public servants with no special insight or wisdom. Despite that, it constantly tells us what is best for us and how we should run our lives.

It tells us we should eat healthy foods, not smoke, wear a helmet when we ride a bicycle and not use marijuana. It tells us how to discipline our children, whether we can renovate our houses and who we are permitted to marry. It prevents us from owning a gun to protect our families in our own home and stops us from obtaining help to end our own lives even when we are in terminal pain. It forces us to vote even when we don't want to.

It ties up enterprising businesses in regulations and red tape that prevent them from investing, expanding and employing more people.

The LDP believes people should make their own choices and accept responsibility for the consequences. It believes governments have neither the expertise nor the right to tell people how to run their lives and should stick to things like protecting Australia from attack and safeguarding property rights. The LDP believes in legalising assisted suicide, the right of self defence and voluntary voting. It considers property owners (including hoteliers and restaurateurs), not the government, should decide whether smoking is allowed on their property and whether to remove trees on their land.

It believes the government has no business regulating victimless crimes such as adult consensual prostitution, adult pornography or risky behaviour that harms nobody else. It believes speed limits should be determined by what most motorists regard as safe, not what public servants deem to be acceptable.

Even when the choices that individuals make are unwise and could harm them, so long as nobody else is involuntarily adversely affected the LDP says, "It's your choice, not the government's."

Wonder what the response from the Liberals and Democrats will be this time around to an obvious attempt to bounce off two well-known political brands?

4 comments:

reclaimfreedom said...

Clarencegirl, please look up the words "classical liberalism" and "libertarian". Your political ignorance is showing.

The LDP is based on free enterprise plus civil rights. That's not hard to understand at all. The ACT NZ party in New Zealand is very similar, as is the Libertarian Party in the US, that country's next biggest party after the Democrats and Republicans.

Our change of name has nothing to do with bouncing off anyone. We were first registered as the Liberal Democrats in 2001 but new Liberal legislation was interpreted so the AEC rejected the name prior to the election last year. We just want our name back.

As to your opinion that we are marginal, it depends on your definition. We got 4.2% of the vote in the Gippsland by-election. We reckon that makes us a minor rather than a micro party. Only another 46% and we'll form the government.

clarencegirl said...

David,

I noticed how the LDP polled in the Gippsland by-election.
4.23% of votes meant that LDP ran last in the ballot box race.

"Only another 46% and we'll form the government."
As you would well know; one by-election result could never be translated into a reliable indication of how a marginal party would fare at a general election.
However, I applaud your political optimisim.

Nothing in your argument convinces me that the LDP did not intend to bounce-off known political brandnames, which existed at the time it was formed and to date.

reclaimfreedom said...

That makes us even clarencegirl. Nothing in your argument convinces me you know much about politics.

I suspect you are one of those unthinking voters who always vote Liberal and never stop to think why.

clarencegirl said...

"I suspect you are one of those unthinking voters who always vote Liberal and never stop to think why."
Oh dear, David, you obviously haven't read many posts on this blog.
I don't think that would describe any of the authors on this site.
Still your comment is an amusing flipside to one Nationals reader who is convinced 'North Coast Voices' is an ALP front!
As I'm in a regional area where dialup is the most functional internet connection, I shall not be online again until tomorrow.
Have a good one for the rest of the day.